Impeachment.

And so it begins.

On Tuesday, faced with growing evidence that Trump had used the power to his office to try to strong-arm the Ukrainian president into providing dirt on Joe Biden and his family, Speaker Pelosi announced the House would launch an impeachment inquiry against the president.

A friend said to me that he was surprised how cathartic it was just knowing that, finally, Trump is being held to account for the extreme lawlessness of his presidency. He’s right. The very act of initiating an impeachment inquiry changes not just the political calculus in the country but also the psychological calculus. For Trump’s presidency has been a non-stop battering ram used by a resurgent nationalist right to beat down progressives – not only politically, but also emotionally; it has been honed to send anyone with a conscience into an emotional tailspin, using the spectacle of cruelty, attacking standards of truth and of evidence, fine-tuning the art of the coarse insults, all to break down a sense of normalcy, all to set ablaze the basic supporting structures of democratic culture.

The take-no-prisoners methods have sent deep fissures into the political foundations of this democracy; and each successive outrage has further weakened those foundations.

There has been, from the get-go, an almost sociopathic hubris to the Trump project. He runs on risk, seeming to get an almost sensual charge out of seeing how far over the line of legality he can go without consequence. Remember that campaign line about how he could shoot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue and not pay a political price? That has been the modus operandi of his entire presidency. America’s forty fifth president has deliberately cultivated a cult of the personality that positively revels in his illegalities as well as his moral outrages. And, increasingly, the cult has brought down into the muck all those involved in keeping the machine going: career officials, political appointees, party hacks, business cronies, advisers… even foreign leaders. There is a contagious culture of criminality to Trump, one that enmeshes anyone who spends too much time in his orbit.

Now, however, those chickens are about to come home to roost for Trump. Or, to put it another way, all of that animating hubris has finally turned around and bitten Trump in his sorry ass.

Here’s what we know so far: Trump made a series of vaguely coded threats and promises to the Ukrainian president – implying that American aid to the country, previously approved by Congress with no strings attached, would be withheld unless the Ukrainians investigated Biden; and simultaneously dangling out the promise of improved economic and military relations if they went to work to dig up the dirt on the ex-VP.

We know that this interaction so disturbed at least one, but likely two, intelligence officials who were present for these conversations, that they referred the issue to the Justice Department, and that one person filed a whistleblower complaint – a complaint that the Inspector General and Director of National Intelligence were prevented, at the insistence of the White House, from delivering to Congress. We know that Trump was so confident he could control the discourse on this that, faced with a growing uproar over the stonewalling, he then allowed for the release of a “rough” transcript of the July phone conversation – and that that rough version was entirely damning, further boosting the case for impeachment. And we know that, with that transcript the lead story on practically every global media outlet, Trump held a rambling press conference saying the “beautiful” and “perfect” phone conversation was entirely aboveboard, and that the transcript entirely exonerated him of any wrong doing.

Hours later, with members of Congress trailing into a secure room to read over the contents of the whistleblower’s complaint, the White House suddenly classified the contents of the report – presumably in an attempt to stop the general public from finding out exactly what the president did and how it was perceived by his intelligence officials.

Forget the bravado that this is a fight he relishes, forget the shameless fund-raising appeals to Trump’s base that his campaign sent out the moment the impeachment inquiry was launched, forget Trump’s victim-playing and his pronouncement that this is a hoax and a witch-hunt. None of this is going to play well for Trump. Unlike Mueller’s inquiry into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Trump’s appalling phone call with the Ukrainian president can be summarized in an easy-to-follow sound-bite; and the sound-bite isn’t a good one for Donald J. Trump. He sounds like a mob boss in that call, like a don seeking to make a made-man of Zelensky.

It’s not entirely impossible to imagine a scenario in which the final chapter of this ghastly regime plays out as a quick unraveling rather than a long, drawn-out affair. For Trump, who craves adoration, actually has nothing but fair-weather friends in DC; men and women who have contorted themselves into philosophical and moral knots over the past three years to stay on the good side of a man who has time and again humiliated and humbled them. GOP senators will hold their cards close to their chests; they will, for now, dutifully repeat the White House’s talking points; and they will find ways to say that nothing on these phone calls was illegal or wrong or impeachment-worthy. But they will know in their heart of hearts that they are talking nonsense. And they will be keenly aware of the shifting sands of public opinion on this.

As a critical mass of the public shifts decisively away from the president over the next several weeks, as it surely will in the face of an unstoppable barrage of revelations of criminal behavior, a number of GOP senators will peel away. It will be a small number at first, to be sure. Mitt Romney. Maybe Ben Sasse. Perhaps Susan Collins. But, behind the scenes, pressure will grow on McConnell to cut Trump lose. After all, why go down with a corrupt leader who has never thought of the well-being of anyone but himself and who cares not a fig for the well-being of colleagues or the institutional legacy of the party he claims to lead?

— Sasha Abramsky

www.theabramskyreport.com

9 Replies to “Impeachment”

  1. I hope you are right Sasha that this is the beginning of a quick unraveling and that the normal policial process will unfold as it should. But is seems quite clear to me given how Trump is playing this that the plan is not to work within the normal policial process (as you acknowledge in the article). Much media comment has centred on how amazing it is that Trump would release the (not-)transcript when it proves to be so damning. He is no three-dimensional chess player that is for sure but I don’t think he is stupid enough to not know that the transcript at the very least supports the accusations against him. I think the plan is to treat the impeachment investigation (and then if need be impeachment itself) as one more political process to be denigrated and ignored. This strategy has worked very well for him so far and this is now its crux. I have said for several years now that I am not convinced there will be an election in 2020 – this impeachment process has the potential to provide Trump with the tools required to suspend it.

    1. Jim, I agree Trump has no intention of playing “by the rules,” and is quite temperamentally capable of holding the entire election system hostage to his whim. And I think GOP is so compromised morally and politically by making their bed with him that at least some of the party grandees would go along with it. But I’m not at all convinced that that strategy works. They are facing a public relations nightmare as this unfolds.

  2. I would like to emphasise I don’t think that is a reason not to impeach. I think rather it is a reason to make the impeachment inquiry as wide-ranging and hard-hitting as possible. Pelosi made a terrible mistake waiting so long to begin the process. It would be an equally terrible mistake to keep it ‘focussed’ and ‘quick’ as some Democratics seem to be urging.

  3. I heard a Yale professor comment on the fact that we must understand and address the conditions in this country that elected a person like Trump. So let’s get the intellectual javelins out and get this disgrace out of office(maybe catch a few others in the net) and start working on the underlying problems.

  4. Sash – keep up the strong work. Trump is going to argue that Ukraine, Italy, and Australia have ganged up on him. He is the victim. keeps his base home, confuses discourse. Adam Schiff’s clarity is the counter. It goes to the election, and the dem’s need a candidate who will mobilize voter turnout.
    Peace out
    Gary

Leave a Reply

Member Categories

Most Popular:

Appearances

Purchase a Gift Subscription

Give your favorite person the gift of a yearly membership to The Abramsky Report. This will include 4 articles per month for 12 months.
[pmpro_signup submit_button="Purchase Gift" level="4" login="0" hidelabels="true" custom_fields="false" short="false" redirect="referrer"]

Subscribe

Semi-Annual Member - $14.95

Half yearly membership to The Abramsky Report includes 4 articles per month for 6 months. At the end of your membership you will be reminded that your membership is about to expire and you will receive an invitation to either renew or your membership will automatically renew depending upon your initial selection at time of membership.

Annual Membership - $19.95

Full year membership to The Abramsky Report includes 4 articles per month for 12 months.
[pmpro_signup submit_button="Subscribe" level="2" login="0" custom_fields="true" short="true" redirect="referrer"]